Like Omaha, Squirrel supports multiple channels (eg. It is primarily made for C# applications, but can also manage applications written in other languages. Squirrel's focus is on simplicity, and it generally succeeds in that regard. It is a framework and a set of tools for installing and updating your application on your users' machines. In addition to striving for Omaha's power, Squirrel aims to improve whereįalls short. Like many other update frameworks, Squirrel's documentation mentions Chrome's update system – that is, Google Omaha – as a shining example. Note however that Electron's technological foundation, Chromium, still uses Omaha. It has seen additional interest in recent years because Is less powerful than Omaha, but easier to set up. If you are a smaller company with fewer users, then one of the alternative update frameworks below might be a better fit for you. Omaha should be a good fit if you are a startup wishing to scale, or a larger enterprise. It's free to get in touch and we normally respond within one business day. If you would like our help with Omaha, then please use the button below. This allows us to implement Omaha more cost-effectively and with a higher quality than organizations who do it themselves. This is the niche ourįills: We have years of experience working with Google Omaha across many different client projects. However, there is a drawback to its power: It's difficult to set up. In short, Omaha is the gold standard for enterprise-grade deployment of Windows software.Īs mentioned before, Omaha is open source so you can set it up yourself. It doesn't get any better, especially with Google's excellent engineers behind it. They also have a very natural split between Windows 7 and Windows 10.īecause of this widespread use, Omaha is the most powerful, stable and secure update system. Those machines range from simple end user PCs to devices in highly restricted environments, such as corporate banking systems. This means that Chrome, and thus Omaha, are installed on hundreds of millions of machines. Chrome's browser market share on those machines is 63%. If you'd like to get a quick overview of this technology, you can for instance see thisĪt the time of this writing, there are 1 billion Windows PCs worldwide. This is because Google have open sourced their client implementation in a GitHub project called What's less well-known is that you can actually use Chrome's update mechanism for your own applications. This is also reflected by the fact that virtually all other solutions explicitly try to implement an update system "as good as Chrome's". When you ask "Which program has the best update framework?", then many people will reply "Google Chrome". Is your application a GUI program or a Windows Service that runs in the background? Do you want to notify users of updates and let them decide when to apply them? Or do you want updates to be applied transparently in the background? How important is security to you? Do the system administrators that install your software wish to be able to "hold back" a new version until it has been tested? Should your software be updated only for the current user, or for all users on the current machine? These are all questions that will likely affect your decision as to which update framework to use. But when it comes to the actual implementation, there are several things to consider. The goal is clear: As a developer, you want to keep your software updated on your users' systems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |